The Wildlife Trusts offer post-Brexit agricultural policy proposals

The organisation believes that farmers should get paid for a range of benefits and services that society needs but which farmers can’t directly sell, as they can with food. These benefits include:

• Healthy soils

• Clean water

• Clean air and climate change mitigation

• Flood risk management

• More, bigger and better natural habitats

• Thriving wildlife everywhere

• Abundant pollinators

• Healthy people

Yorkshire Wildlife Trust has taken these policy proposals and applied them to the River Aire catchment. The related case-study shows how changing policy in this way and directly contracting farmers could deliver public benefits and services. It concludes that a move away from subsidy to direct public contracts for identified public goods, if managed well, would be transformational and dramatically secure environmental, quality of life and economic benefit for all, not least the UK’s farming industry.

A new contract between land managers, the government, taxpayers and consumers could secure the future of not just wildlife but farming communities, a thriving and diverse economy and a living landscape delivering the ecosystem services we rely on.

Ellie Brodie, senior policy manager for land management at The Wildlife Trusts, said: “Our idea is to restore habitats and join them up, often by linking together farmers and targeting investment to where there is most need. We propose three public asset funds for land management, based on delivering the eight benefits. We propose a landscape-scale approach to land management because wildlife and wild places do not recognise boundaries and we need more space for wildlife by growing and joining habitats. These funds should be allocated through local environment plans that target action and investment to achieve nature’s recovery. This approach is based on ecological mapping – a spatial approach to identifying environmental needs through using local data and consultation with local people.”